The weak lead in no limit holdem cash games
Related Articles
In this article I want to dissect the often derided line of leading for a weak bet into a preflop raiser. Commonly referred to as ‘donking out’, the weak lead isn’t an inherently bad line. Like any tool, you just have to be sure you know what you’re using it for. I’m going to offer a quick take on how the weak lead is going to generally be interpreted by your opposition and then suggest some spots where, based on those common interpretations, you can use the bet to your advantage.
The basic context for this article is no limit cash games online, lower to mid stakes (.50/1 – 3/6 range). Additionally, this article is written from a 6-max perspective, although most of the ideas in it should be fairly transferable to full ring play.
What does the weak lead mean?
A weak lead is an opening bet that you make when you’re out of position on the flop to a preflop raiser. The size of the bet is roughly in the range of a minimum bet to a third of the pot. I think minimum bets are something different altogether, so for the purposes of this article, let’s call a weak lead a fifth to a third-pot bet, although the bottom threshold of that range can get a little smaller as the pot gets bigger relative to effective stacks.
That’s what a weak lead is, but what does it mean? That’s the real question we’re concerned with here – when you lead weak, what does that likely signify to your opponents about the nature and quality of your hand? I’d argue that opponents typically default to one of three interpretations of this bet:
1) They assume you’re making a blocking bet with a draw.
This is a very common use of the weak lead, and you’ll see it frequently employed by newer players who have advanced beyond basic strategy. The logic for this use of the weak lead is pretty compelling, on face – if you have a draw and can get your opponent to just call your bet when they would have bet more if you had checked, you in theory get a better ‘price’ for your draw. There’s also the potential for the weak lead to turn into a successful semi-bluff and win the pot, plus your hand will be (again, in theory) disguised if you get called and make your draw. The obvious problem with using the weak lead for this purpose is that it’s pretty transparent to most competent opponents because it’s such a common play.
2) They assume you’re on a marginal made hand and you’re betting for information / value.
The logic here is a bit more confused than the rationalization for the weak lead with a draw. Basically, players are caught between two worlds, often with a hand like middle pair or top pair weak kicker. There’s one world where they’re ahead of your hand and one where they’re behind, and the weak lead attempts to serve both – it keeps their investment low if they’re behind and charges you to keep playing if they’re ahead. This use is primarily where the weak lead gets its bad reputation – as with most bets that try to accomplish two different purposes, it rarely ends up doing either very well.
3) They assume you’re on a strong hand and attempting to induce a raise.
This use grew out an aggressive school of no limit, largely repopularized by online poker, that places a heavy emphasis on taking the lead with your strong hands. It’s certainly a more sophisticated use of the weak lead, as it plays on the expectations created in the average player’s mind by the more common uses of the weak lead. Also, it turns the post-flop aggression of LAGier players back on itself. Still, like any quality play, it’s become a lot more recognizable as more and more players employ it.
There are certainly more ways your opponents could interpret the weak lead. Additionally, it’s worth noting that your savvier opponents will probably not just choose one interpretation and stick with it throughout the hand, but rather will leave some combination of all possibilities open and refine their assessment as they get more information. That said, the stock responses above are still a useful jumping-off point for discussing ways that the weak lead can be used profitably.
Positive scenarios for the weak lead line
Basic poker strategy can be boiled down to a simple concept: take your opponent’s expectations and subvert them. We surveyed the common expectations your opponents are likely to have when you make a weak lead above, so the natural question now is: How can we use the weak lead to subvert their expectations for profit?
1) To get to a three-bet with a combo draw in a heads up pot.
Field: heads up
Your hand: combo draw (10 outs or more)
Preferred opponent: Aggressive
This line takes the typical semi-bluff of the weak lead one step further. Here, the weak lead is used to induce a raise from an opponent looking to protect their hand against your perceived draw. When they raise, you re-raise. The nice thing about this line is that since you have a combo draw you’re likely to be taking it on pretty coordinated flops. Coordinated flops increase the chance that your opponent will raise to protect a vulnerable made hand like top pair or an over pair. When you re-raise, the coordinated board makes it very difficult for those hands to continue, as there’s a chance that you’ve already made your hand and you’re not that far behind if you haven’t. Also, the coordinated board makes your three bet more credible, as you’d likely play a set or two pair the same way to protect against your opponent from drawing out. Finally, it’s a nice set up play, as you can use a similar line against the same opponent with a made hand on slightly less coordinated boards and expect them to beat you into the pot drawing thin or dead.
2) To get a marginal player to commit with a medium-strength made hand on a multi-way flop.
Field: multi-way
Your hand: 2 pair or better
Preferred opponent: Nit
This line is a great way to get a tighter opponent to stack off with an overpair or even top pair when you flop a set or two pair. It works especially well if the board is a little coordinated and if you are to the immediate right of the preflop raiser, leaving players still to act behind them. Here, your lead forces your opponent to defend not only against your perceived draw, but also against all of the potential draws that the players still to act could be holding. You’ll often see nittish and less experienced players go into panic-betting mode in this spot, wildly over-betting the pot. By the time it gets back to you, they’re often either committed or under a pot-sized bet from being so.
3) To stone bluff an aggressive, thinking opponent heads up on a coordinated board.
Field: heads up
Your hand: complete miss or very weak draw
Preferred opponent: Hyper-aggressive
This line relies on playing against an opponent who is smart enough to be paying attention and smart enough to know that you’re paying attention as well. If they’re opening preflop with a wide range of hands, they actually miss a ton of coordinated flops. Consider a flop like 10s 7s 6d – it’s a pretty wet board, but it cold misses pairs 5 and down, a lot of suited aces, and a ton of broadway combinations. When you lead into a board like this weak, your strong opponent will be faced with a difficult decision. You could be representing extreme strength, medium strength or a draw. Peeling with a complete miss doesn’t do them much good against any of the three, and raising can get them into a lot of trouble against two of the three. Faced with a lack of clear, attractive options, aggressive players will often just opt to fold and wait for a better spot. This is obviously the most speculative use of the line, but even though it’s a little out there, remember – it doesn’t have to win the pot often to be a profitable bet, and it’s a good way to keep an aggressive opponent who has position on you off balance to boot.
